Most dangerous game Essay Example for Free

Most dangerous support EssayIn the brief story, The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell, the antecedent uses irony in the short story to support the theme of the book the roles of hunter and hunted frequently reversed. In the short story, Rainsford, a big game hunter, believes that he is creation persuaded by General Zaroff hunt humans with the general. However, Rainsford realizes the truth he is going to get hunted by Zaroff, not hunting with him. You dont nasty cried Rainsford. My dear fellow, said the general, have I not told you I always mean what I say about hunting?(11)is an example of situational irony because the reader didnt expect Rainsford, the big game hunter, to become hunted . The quote supports the thesis because it shows the quick reversal of the role of hunter and hunted in the short story. This quote shows that the role of hunter and hunted are not set in stone Rainsford realizes that he is losing a role that he had always untrue he would always h ave. He is big game not a big game hunter. However, the fluidity of the roles of hunter and prey also works to Rainsfords favor.After jumping into the ocean, Rainsford swims to Zaroffs lair and confronts him in a duel. I congratulate you, He Zaroff said. You have won the game. Rainsford did not smile. I am equable a beast at bay(15) shows the change in the roles of Zaroff and Rainsford. Rainsford infiltrated into Zaroffs home and is now getting ready to kill the general, regardless of the fact that the game is over. It is what the reader least expects, thus a piece of situational irony because prey run away and get hunted down and killed by the predator kind of Rainsford becomes the hunter, and now his demands rules supreme.Zaroff was ambushed by Rainsford and is now at his mercy. He is now the prey, and the rules that he made while hunter are irrelevant. This situation was clearly different from scalawag 11, where the general cheerfully informed Rainford that he was going to be hunted down and killed, thus supporting the thesis that the roles of the hunted and the hunter are changed around. This shows that the author used irony to show that the roles of predator and prey are interchangeable.